Use Sanctions Pressure and Diplomacy with North Korea: Expert

By J C Suresh

TORONTO | WASHINGTON, DC (IDN) – U.S. President Donald Trump and his administration have failed to competently execute their own stated policy of “maximum pressure and engagement” with North Korea, says the Arms Control Association (ACA), which is dedicated to promoting public understanding of and support for effective arms control policies.  ARABIC | BAHASA | JAPANESE｜ NORWEGIAN | SWEDISH

In a statement on North Korea’s 5.9 to 6.3 magnitude nuclear test explosion on September 3, ACA’s Executive Director Daryl G. Kimball says: “Trump has greatly exacerbated the risks through irresponsible taunts and threats of U.S. military force that only give credibility to the North Korean propaganda line that nuclear weapons are necessary to deter U.S. aggression, and have spurred Kim Jong-un to accelerate his nuclear program.”

The nuclear test explosion, he adds, “marks a new and more dangerous era in East Asia.” Because: “The explosion, which produced a yield likely in excess of 100 kilotons TNT equivalent, strongly suggests that North Korea has indeed successfully tested a compact but high-yield nuclear device that can be launched on intermediate- or intercontinental-range ballistic missiles.”

Still more nuclear tests are likely and necessary for North Korea to confirm the reliability of the system, adds Kimball, but after more than two decades of effort, North Korea has a dangerous nuclear strike capability that can hold key targets outside of its region at risk. “This capability has been reached since U.S. President Donald Trump threatened North Korea with ‘fire and fury’ if Pyongyang continued its nuclear and missile pursuits Aug. 8.”

The inability of the international community to slow and reverse North Korea’s nuclear and missile pursuits, says Kimball, is the result of missteps and miscalculations by many actors, including the previous two U.S. administrations – George W. Bush and Barack Obama – as well as previous Chinese, Japanese, and South Korean governments.

“The crisis has now reached a very dangerous phase in which the risk of conflict through miscalculation by either side is unacceptably high. Trump and his advisers need to curb his impulse to threaten military action, which only increases this risk,” warns ACA’s Executive Director.

Kimball opines further: “A saner and more effective approach is to work with China, Russia, and other UN Security Council members to tighten the sanctions pressure and simultaneously open a new diplomatic channel designed to defuse tensions and to halt and eventually reverse North Korea’s increasingly dangerous nuclear and missile programs.”

Kimball urges all sides “to immediately work to de-escalate the situation” adding:

1. Washington needs to consult with and reassure its Asian allies, particularly South Korea and Japan, that the United States, and potentially China and Russia, will come to their defence if North Korea commits aggression against them.
2. As the United States engages in joint military exercise with South Korean and Japanese forces, U.S. forces must avoid operations that suggest the Washington is planning or initiating a pre-emptive strike on North Korea, which could trigger miscalculation on the part of Pyongyang.
3. Proposals to reintroduce U.S. tactical nuclear weapons in South Korea are counterproductive and would only heighten tensions and increase the risk of a nuclear conflict.
4. The United States must work with the world community to signal that international pressure – though existing UN-mandated sanctions on North Korean activities and trade that can support its illicit nuclear and missile activities – will continue so long as North Korea fails to exercise restraint. Better enforcement of UN sanctions designed to hinder North Korea’s weapons procurement, financing, and key sources of foreign trade and revenue is very important.
5. Sanctions designed to limit North Korea’s oil imports should now be considered. While such measures can help change North Korea’s cost-benefit calculations in a negotiation about the value of their nuclear program, it is naive to think that sanctions alone, or bellicose U.S. threats of nuclear attack, can compel North Korea to change course.
6. The United States must consistently and proactively communicate our interest in negotiations with North Korea aimed at halting further nuclear tests and intermediate- and long-range ballistic missile tests and eventually to verifiably denuclearize the Korean peninsula, even if that goal may no longer be realistically achievable with the Kim regime in power.
7. Washington must also be willing to do more than to simply say it is “open to talks,” but must be willing to take the steps that might help achieve actual results. This should include possible modification of U.S. military exercises and manoeuvres in ways that do not diminish deterrence and military readiness, such as replacing command post exercises with seminars that serve the same training purpose, dialling down the strategic messaging of exercises, spreading out field training exercises to smaller levels, and moving exercises away from the demilitarized zone on the border.

Kimball stresses that the latest North Korean nuclear test once again underscores the importance of universalizing the 1996 Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).

The ACA Executive Director warns: “Unless there is a more serious, more coordinated, and sustained diplomatic strategy to reduce tensions and to halt further nuclear tests and long-range ballistic missile tests in exchange for measures that ease North Korea’s fear of military attack, Pyongyang’s nuclear strike capabilities will increase, with a longer range and less vulnerable to attack, and the risk of a catastrophic war on the Korean peninsula will likely grow.” [IDN-InDepthNews – 4 September 2017]

Photo: People in Pyongyang watch Kim Jong-un on North Korean TV, 2015. Credit: Wikimedia Commons